Jump to content

Talk:When We Were Orphans

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

he does not go to his grandother in england, he goes to his aunt.

That's right, it's his aunt. I'll change it. Skinnyweed 15:50, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Having just finished the book, I'm left wondering to what extent we can believe anything that this narrator tells us about what might or might not have 'happened'. Isn't it just possible, for instance, that the woman he describes as his mother at the end of the novel is no-one of the sort? He doesn't want to take her home, doesn't wish her to be buried there and she doesn't physically resemble his mother. Maybe she is a manifestation of his wishes or regrets. Equally, I don't accept at face value the description of what happened to his parents. His mother became a prostitute to save him from destitution? Could it be that this is childhood guilt and shame finding expression / resolution through a terrible sort of fantasy?

On a basic level - with a narrator this unreliable, how can we relate the 'story' in a meaningful way? I'd be very interested in your thoughts.

Just a note, not sure how this compares with wikipedia policy, but some of this article reads very similarly to the the review from Publishers Weekly, accessible from Amazon. Alistair 19/12/07 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.242.143.170 (talk) 07:24, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:When We Were Orphans.jpg

[edit]

Image:When We Were Orphans.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 15:37, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Summary too naive and lacking depth

[edit]

The plot summary seems to be a fairly naive, almost like a straightforward reading of the novel. Although some concessions are made about the lack of clarity on some facts from Christoper's life (e.g. how exactly did he become such a famous detective?), it is not adequately conveyed that this is a case of an extremely unreliable narrator. From the first pages the reader is given clues that other people have perceptions of Christopher very different from his own. Almost every alleged fact from his narration -- that is to say, the whole book, since he narrates it -- is called into question. The narration gets stranger and stranger as the story progresses; the whole story about his parents is completely unclear. The whole section about his recovery of his childhood house, now inhabited by Chinese people, is downright surreal. Not mentioning the less straightforward reading of this novel is doing the book a disservice. This is definitely NOT a detective story! 201.231.81.83 (talk) 02:27, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Irrelevant references

[edit]

None of the three references here are relevant to what they're footnoting. None of the three contains the quotation it follows and none is a substantial source.

Especially offensive is the Ishiguro quotation about it not being his best work, when the interview in reference 1 contains no such idea. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.12.67.151 (talk) 03:37, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are wrong. All the quotes in the article appear in the sources in the exact same form. Christopher Connor (talk) 04:21, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on When We Were Orphans. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:25, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:When_We_Were_Orphans&oldid=1206028874"